Jump to content

Photo

Revealing Top Raiders Of The Week

raiding good inspiring

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1
proschultz

proschultz
  • 3 posts

Every week war is always on with one day to rest and the other days to raid .

 

Within the war the top alliances struggle to be in the top 3 alliances to get their top raiders a percentage of the reward.

Therefore , raiders do their best to get the best team and to be the best themselves to get a reward which makes the

Top 3 alliance the main target of all alliances , which is why people do their best to get fuel but in order to do that you

need to have a a good alliance and this is where this idea comes in.

 

Good raiders from weak alliances eventually will transfer to the top 3 best alliances which leaves behind the other alliances

instead of trying but they will transfer and look for good alliances . Their purpose for transferring is to get a percentage of

that top alliance's reward fuel for themselves to earn . But what if we add a new leader board of Top 10 best raiders of the

week and giving a bit of fuel reward of those who get in that list which makes good raiders from weak alliances lessen their

possibility of just transferring to the best alliances and try to get fuel from top 3 alliance's fuel distribution percentage .

Which makes more alliances to have good players instead of only 3 alliances always  taking the top 3 list which makes

other alliance just audience.

 

Making this so called "Top Raiders Of the week" leader board will have more pros than cons because of course there is no

such thing as a perfect decision .

 

I will only list down the pros of this idea because i know that there would be also some cons but it's up to you to consider them

 

Pros :

 

- Main good thing is that there will be more scattered good players which makes the top 3 a good competition instead of a cheer dance competition for the remaining alliances

 

- Players who created their own alliances but have problem in getting in top 3 alliances because of the lack of good players since almost 90% of the good players are in top 3 alliances which makes the list just strive for top 3 or top 4 which is sad for other alliances . But with this idea the leaders or the few players who love to stay in their alliance because of their friends but wants to earn fuel can now get fuel with their basic alliance by just raiding to be in top 10 best 

 

- With this idea the game can distribute more encouragement for players because of the new added reason to play even more and might even "pay" even more :)

 

- If this leader board is as updated as that alliance board which shows the progression of the players in top 10 which makes those who are or aren't in the top 10 board even try harder or in easier terms , it makes the tension and competition of players in game and makes it even more fun

 

- Players that gets in top 10 will gain fame for example the first raider goes in trade everyone would be like "deym , that guy is first raider last week... he good bruh .. he good" which benefits the good players of course and makes "fame" a  reason to strive for top 10 and again .. it increases the tension and competition of players in game.

 

-There are other good things about this idea and feel free to add in comments and support.

 

Cons

 

- I leave this to the people in comments which knows best about spotting Cons in ideas.. 

 

 

 

May this suggestion reach the minds of the developers


  • 1

#2
BLACKDRAGON

BLACKDRAGON
  • 207 posts

any alliance still can get fuels from warbox atleast. If want more fuels need fight for top 3. What you need is an alliance and find a good raiders, or you also can be the one. 1st place is hard to get but 2nd place and 3rd is easy when your alliance all teamwork to raid.


  • 1

#3
lael

lael
  • 242 posts

Individual war boxes pretty much addressed this issue awhile ago and thank "con" for them!  The belief that only good raiders are in the top 3 alliances is a bit naive:  Many players chose to be in less competitive alliances and just raid for their personal war boxes to avoid alot of the "drama."  Moreover an additional 200, 350 or even 500 fuel for these individuals is not enough of an incentive considering those in the top 3 alliances usually burn way more fuel than they ever hope to recoupe with the mere alliance reward.  Imo, top 3 is more for glory and bragging right than anything else.


Edited by lael, 03 June 2017 - 02:09 AM.

  • 0

#4
lael

lael
  • 242 posts

Really? 1) I was responding to the original post 2) Do you even realize how much fuel it takes to be in the top 10 of the top 3? 3) There are plenty of 1-2 man alliances with "top raiders" who chose not to competitively participate in the top alliances and just raid for the actual fun of it and not game "fame."


  • 0

#5
lael

lael
  • 242 posts

1) The addition of the individual war statistic feature is tantamount to a personal leader board.  2) Disciplinary action against the top raiding alts in their own top raiding alliances. LOLOL.  It is these alts that help their alliance achieve top 3.  3)In my experience, during a very competitive war round, the top 10 accounts in the top 2 alliances do burn an enormous amount of fuel, not just to be in the top 10 but to raid to have their alliance place 1st.  4) It is when, such as in this current not-- too competitive round, the members in the alliance placing first also have their alts competitively raiding in the additional top 2 and top 3 alliances. respectively that I think Con should take disciplinary action to prevent the potential for alliance collusion and the manipulation/monopolization of alliance wars.  4) Personally, I usually burn fuel when raiding to speed up return times because I am impatient and do not like to leave my compound unguarded and no amount of reward could ever equal the amount I spend which again is my choice.


  • 0

#6
lael

lael
  • 242 posts

There is a leader board in alliances that records all alliance members war points.  Moreover, there are statistics available within the alliances for the amount of flags a player has defended and mission completed etc.  I know of no top raider that makes hundreds or thousands of fuel each week in a top competitive raiding alliance as I have said before any fuel earned is negated by that players choice to burn fuel to achieve the maximum amount of war raiding results in the least amount of time.  The players that actually earn alot of fuel each week are "fuel raiders" who do not raid for war points perse but just raid the fuel generator to steal the fuel of other players, aligned and unaligned alike.  I find it curious that you, Fred, have made so many posts about so many dz topics without actually seeming to have ever been in a top war raiding alliance, let alone any alliance.  Not that you are not entitled to your opinion, you are, just that as in this particular instance some of your ideas are actually game features and therefore redundant and purposeless.


  • 0

#7
lael

lael
  • 242 posts

A top 4 alliance is not equivalent to a top 3 alliance:  nuff said.  You , yourself, in other posts admitted to being relatively new to the game,so I assumed nothing.  As for "random nonsense" I believe that best describes the majority of the posts you have recently flooded the forums with:  all you ideas and proposed game changes are in my opinion impractical and not constructive to the game as it presently exists.  Any change requires time and money on the part of the game developers so for the sake of real practicality, perhaps, you should consider the feasibility of any game change you suggest i.e. is it worth their time and money to implement any of your suggestions.  Ideas are great, until they become unnecessary, impractical and just a "distraction."  


  • 0

#8
lael

lael
  • 242 posts

Well, in the dead zone game I play Fuel does ultimately determine how much one is able to do..and now you are extremely off topic as I never critiqued you personally just that your posts and ideas do reflect that you are indeed somewhat new to the game and perhaps unaware of all of the game features...i.e.  hot fixes do occur when needed, alliance members can chat with their alliance via the activity board if banned, etcetera.  There have been many additions and changes to the game over the last five years based on players Input.  Moreover as I said you are totally entitled to any of your many ideas and opinions, many of which I find to be redundant to existing game features and unnecessary  to enhance the game based on a cost-effective analysis and that is my opinion.  So "commander" , if you post and idea and opinion then be prepared to be challenged bases on that and not "take it personally."


  • 0

#9
lael

lael
  • 242 posts

No.  I was not criticizing you personally.  The amount of time you have been playing or lackthereof has been aptly demonstrated by your numerous posts ..that is and continues to be my observation based upon your continued comments here and elsewhere.  1)  Using fuel to speed up return time on raids ABSOLUTELY DOES help a player maximize their war points during any war round assuming equal skill sets of players.  Armor games has had much more competitive alliance war rounds than Kong.  Top raiders in very competitive war rounds at Armor Games do burn an insanely large amount  of fuel,,,way more than they ever win in alliance wars or by any other means. 2)  Why have more leaderboards when a players personal war statistics are readily available as well as the individual leaderboards in each alliances.  3) Saying you are a new player is not an insult or an attack but a fact yourself referred to in other posts.  4) players can achieve "game fame" in a variety of way and it seems that here in your forums you have found your niche:)


  • 0

#10
chris327

chris327
  • 76 posts
Fred you didn't beat a top 3 alliance. You beat me and 1 other raider with no alts 1 week.
  • 0

#11
Yolento

Yolento
  • 12 posts

I believe this is a good idea, not the part of give rewards to the top 10 raiders, or sort a reward between the top 50 raiders, but the part of create an statistic that show the top 100 raiders of the week.

 

That would be really nice to see. I'm sure it's not hard develop that, only consolidate what every alliance already has and create a top 100 raiders weekly statistic for the public. 


  • 0



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: raiding, good, inspiring