I do believe he can make his own decision.
As do I, not that I or you need to state such an obvious thing..... :/
If this were the first time I had seen "zomg this guy is hacking, he flattened my/our compound/s and I/we don't understand how, therefore he must be a hacker" (or similar) I would let it go.
But it's not the first time, or the second, etc.... I'm fed up of seeing people accuse certain raiders of being hackers just because they had their compound laid to waste; it gets real old, real quick.
Anyone know how difficult it would be to find proper, non-anecdotal evidence of cheating? Next to impossible.
Finding evidence may be difficult, especially in certain circumstances, but when the OP makes this statement: "and he trashes every compound he hits with no casualties" I do have to wonder about his credibility, seeing as it is very unlikely he actually knows that for sure, and the choice of his wording had an obvious intent.
Did you even read what I posted?
My first post had 3 small lines (excluding quotes); one that posed a simple question, the next that pointed out the fallacy of a statement made by the OP, and the last that mentioned the abuse of the word 'research' (IMO). So I fail to see how I shot him down, and in my second post I even mentioned that yes the guy could still be cheating, I just doubt it, that's all.
Lastly, we are in a public forum, with the obvious expectation that people will comment on what you post; if Flamefalco wanted a private word with Con then he could have just emailed support..... So I fail to see the point of your post, all things considered.
PS - She also sings.